| [2022] FWC 687 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
United Workers’ Union
v
AnglicareSA Limited
(B2022/238)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 29 MARCH 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of AnglicareSA Limited
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of AnglicareSA (the Respondent).
On 28 March 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application, subject to certain amendments that had been agreed between the parties being adopted in the proposed order.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Alen Clifford of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVS has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVS has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.
Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.
An order has been separately issued in PR739768.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR739767>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v AnglicareSA Limited [2022] FWC 687
- Case
- [2022] FWC 687
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the Fair Work Commission was required to decide included whether there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and whether the requirements in section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met. The Commission was also required to decide whether Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the notification time had been met and that the requirements in section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met. The Commission also determined that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and appointed it as the protected action ballot agent. The Commission was satisfied that CiVS was capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously.
The Fair Work Commission appointed CiVS as the protected action ballot agent for the United Workers' Union's proposed ballot. An order was separately issued in PR739768.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.