United Voice v Gold Coast Kennels Discretionary Trust t/a AAA Pet Resort
Case
•
[2018] FWCFB 128
•12 JANUARY 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
United Voice v Gold Coast Kennels Discretionary Trust t/a AAA Pet Resort [2018] FWCFB 128
[2018] FWCFB 128
12 JANUARY 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
United Voice, an Australian trade union, appealed a decision of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) which had ruled against the union in a dispute with Gold Coast Kennels Discretionary Trust trading as AAA Pet Resort. The union had sought to have the employees of the resort recognised as employees covered under an award, and when this was refused, it appealed to the Federal Court. The Court was required to decide whether the FWC had erred in its application of the law in refusing to recognise the employees as covered by the award. The union argued that the employees were performing work for the resort and were therefore covered by the award. The resort argued that the employees were not performing work for the resort but were instead providing services to the resort's clients.
The Court held that the FWC had correctly applied the law in finding that the employees were not performing work for the resort, and were therefore not covered by the award. The Court found that the employees were providing services to the resort's clients, and that the resort was not the employer of the employees. The Court found that the union had failed to provide evidence that the employees were performing work for the resort, and therefore the FWC's decision was correct. The appeal was dismissed with costs. The Court did not make any orders as the appeal was dismissed.
The Court held that the FWC had correctly applied the law in finding that the employees were not performing work for the resort, and were therefore not covered by the award. The Court found that the employees were providing services to the resort's clients, and that the resort was not the employer of the employees. The Court found that the union had failed to provide evidence that the employees were performing work for the resort, and therefore the FWC's decision was correct. The appeal was dismissed with costs. The Court did not make any orders as the appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Repudiation & Termination
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Kate Southern v Lucky 88 Enterprises Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 725
Cases Citing This Decision
24
Roberts and Secretary, Attorney-General's Department
[2020] AATA 1494
Ingleton v Boswell
[2025] FedCFamC2G 977
Menulog Pty Ltd
[2021] FWCFB 4053
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
0
Gold Coast Kennels Discretionary Trust T/A AAA Pet Resort
[2017] FWCA 4283
IKEA Pty Ltd T/A IKEA
[2017] FWCA 4238
Samboot Pty Ltd T/A Samford Pet Resort and Northshore Pet Resort
[2016] FWCA 4382