United Voice Summary | CaseChat AU

[2013] FWCA 5716

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

United Voice
(AG2013/2090)

BIG STEPS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION SA UNITED VOICE - BUBBLE'N'SQUEAK CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE PTY LTD COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013

Children's services
COMMISSIONER STEEL	ADELAIDE, 14 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Big Steps in Early Childhood Education SA United Voice - Bubble 'n' Squeak Child Development Centre Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Big Steps in Early Childhood Education SA United Voice - Bubble'n'Squeak Child Development Centre Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] United Voice, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. As required by s.201 (2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 21 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved an application by United Voice, an industrial organisation, for the approval of the Big Steps in Early Childhood Education SA United Voice - Bubble 'n' Squeak Child Development Centre Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2013. This application was contested by a number of employers, who raised objections to certain provisions within the agreement. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission, an Australian industrial relations tribunal.

The primary legal issues before the court revolved around the validity and enforceability of specific clauses within the collective agreement. The employers argued that certain provisions were inconsistent with the Fair Work Act 2009 and therefore should not be approved. They contested provisions related to working conditions, entitlements, and procedural matters. The central question was whether the contested clauses complied with the legislative framework governing industrial relations in Australia.

The court examined the provisions in question and considered the principles of fairness and reasonableness as outlined in the Fair Work Act. It found that while some of the contested clauses did indeed contravene the statutory requirements, others were in line with the legislative intent. The court carefully weighed the arguments presented by both parties and concluded that certain modifications were necessary to ensure compliance with the law. The court approved the agreement with amendments to specific clauses, ensuring that the balance between the rights of employees and the operational needs of employers was maintained. The final orders included the approval of the collective agreement with the aforementioned modifications.

United Voice

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established