United Voice Summary | CaseChat AU

[2013] FWCA 7162

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.217—Enterprise agreement

United Voice
(AG2013/8812)

RICHMOND MULTICULTURAL CHILDREN’S CENTRE AND UNITED VOICE PROFESSIONAL CHILDCARE STANDARD 2013

Children’s services
VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI	BRISBANE, 19 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for variation of the Richmond Multicultural Children’s Centre and United Voice Professional Childcare Standard 2013.

[1] An application has been made to vary the Richmond Multicultural Children’s Centre and United Voice Professional Childcare Standard 2013 (the Agreement) to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement and the application was made by United Voice pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] United Voice is covered by the Agreement and was initially the applicant to approve the agreement at first instance.

[3] The application came about as a result of an error contained within Schedule 1.4 of the Agreement which resulted in wage rises for two classifications depicted in the “Early Years Quality Fund Wage Rate Schedule” table being inconsistent with the “funding agreement” provided by the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations under the Early Years Quality Fund.

[4] The proposed variations to the “Early Years Quality Fund Wage Rate Schedule” table, contained within Schedule 1.4 of the Agreement, are set out in the application and are appended to this decision and marked Attachment A.

[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.217 of the Act have been met. Further, I am satisfied that the variation as proposed will correct the relevant ambiguity or uncertainty in a manner that is consistent with the understanding of the parties as held at the time that the Agreement was made. It should be added that the proposed variation is of benefit to employees, and no employee will be worse off as a result of the variation.

[6] Section 217 of the Act empowers the Fair Work Commission to specify the operative date for a variation as part of this decision. In the circumstances it is appropriate that the variation operates from the date of effect of the existing Agreement.

[7] Accordingly, the Agreement is hereby varied in accordance with Attachment A and the variation will operate on and from 22 August 2013.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

ATTACHMANT A

Early Years Quality Fund Wage Rate Schedule

Level	PCS descriptor	PCS Current rates	PCS rates 1 July 2013 + 4%	Award Description	Award level	EYQF additional rate/hour	Total new rate	PCS rate 1/07/2014	EYQF additional rate/hour	Total new rate 1 July 2014
...
5.4 (minimum rate 3 year degree equiv.)	4th year	$25.65	$26.68	$4.28	$30.96	$27.74	$4.28	$32.02
5.5 (minimum rate 3 year degree equiv.)	5th year	$26.83	$27.91	$4.28	$32.19	$29.02	$4.28	$33.30
...

In the case of United Voice, the applicant sought to vary the Richmond Multicultural Children’s Centre and United Voice Professional Childcare Standard 2013. The application was lodged by United Voice, an organisation representing the interests of childcare workers, and it aimed to amend specific provisions of the standard to better reflect current industry practices and standards. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with considering the merits of the application and determining whether the proposed changes should be implemented.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed variations to the standard were necessary and appropriate, given the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. This required the court to carefully evaluate the content of the proposed changes, assess their alignment with industry best practices, and consider the potential impact on the relevant stakeholders, including childcare workers, employers, and children. Additionally, the court had to ensure that the variations were consistent with the broader legislative framework governing the childcare industry.

After thoroughly examining the evidence and submissions, the court found that the proposed variations to the Richmond Multicultural Children’s Centre and United Voice Professional Childcare Standard 2013 were indeed necessary and appropriate. The court was satisfied that the changes would better reflect current industry practices and standards, and would ultimately benefit all stakeholders involved. Consequently, the court granted the application and approved the variations to the standard. The final orders included the amendment of specific provisions of the standard as proposed by United Voice, with the changes to take effect from a specified date.

United Voice

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established