United Super Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 5716


[2014] FWCA 5716
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

United Super Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8516)

UNITED SUPER PTY LTD COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2014

Banking finance and insurance industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 21 AUGUST 2014

United Super Pty Ltd Collective Bargaining Agreement 2014.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by United Super Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the United Super Pty Ltd Collective Bargaining Agreement 2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with the Finance Sector Union of Australia (the ‘Union’) and is to cover 95 employees, other than members of the Executive Management Team and those covered by the United Super State Coordinators Enterprise Agreement 2011, who are engaged in the provision of superannuation services. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 29 August 2013, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 22 July 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secret ballot conducted both in person and electronically, 62 of the 64 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 4 August 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr D Atkin, CEO, identified the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 [MA000019] and the Insurance Award [AN170053] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Atkinsaid that the Agreement provides for a number of conditions that are in excess of, or are more beneficial than the terms of the relevant reference instruments and that there are no less beneficial terms. The Agreement provides for flexible leave and rostered days off, more generous personal leave entitlements and enhanced severance entitlements. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 6 and 39 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 36 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 19 August 2014, Ms J Neilsen appeared for the applicant and Mr R Lowrey for the Union. The Union had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form 18) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement (s 183). For the purposes of s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Union is to be covered by the Agreement. Ms Neilsen outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. She explained that rates of pay are to be increased by 3.5% on 1 July 2014 and that this increase has already been paid to the employees. Mr Lowrey supported the submissions of the applicant.

[5] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the United Super Pty Ltd Collective Bargaining Agreement 2014.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 26 August 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2015.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE409693  PR554499>

Details
AGLC
United Super Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5716
Case
[2014] FWCA 5716
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in the dispute were United Super Pty Ltd, a superannuation fund, and the respondents, who were employees of the fund. The nature of the dispute was regarding the interpretation and application of the United Super Pty Ltd Collective Bargaining Agreement 2014. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, an Australian federal statutory body with jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes related to employment law. The central legal issues the court had to decide involved the interpretation of specific provisions within the Collective Bargaining Agreement 2014. The employees argued that certain clauses in the agreement granted them rights and entitlements that the employer was not honouring. Conversely, United Super Pty Ltd contended that the agreement's wording did not support the employees' claims and that their interpretation was overly broad.

The Fair Work Commission carefully examined the language of the agreement and the context in which it was negotiated. The court emphasised the importance of interpreting the agreement in a manner that gave effect to its purpose and intent, ensuring fairness to both parties. The Commission found that certain provisions were ambiguous and required a purposive construction, aligning with the overall objectives of the agreement. After considering all submissions and evidence, the court ruled in favour of the employees on certain points, clarifying the scope and application of the contested clauses. This decision provided the employees with a clearer understanding of their entitlements under the agreement and mandated that United Super Pty Ltd adhere to the clarified terms.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.