United Group Rail Services Limited

Case [2013] FWCA 307


[2013] FWCA 307

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

United Group Rail Services Limited
(AG2012/12907)

UGL RAIL SERVICES PTY LTD BASSENDEAN ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY

PERTH, 15 JANUARY 2013

Application for approval of the UGL Rail Services Pty Ltd Bassendean Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UGL Rail Services Pty Ltd Bassendean Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2014.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE899351  PR533182>

Details
AGLC
United Group Rail Services Limited [2013] FWCA 307
Case
[2013] FWCA 307
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved United Group Rail Services Limited, where the applicant sought approval for the UGL Rail Services Pty Ltd Bassendean Enterprise Agreement 2012. The application was brought under the Fair Work Act 2009, with the objective of securing approval for the proposed enterprise agreement, which outlined the terms and conditions of employment for employees of the applicant company. The Commission's task was to determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including whether it facilitated the efficient operation of the business, provided for the resolution of workplace disputes, and met other legislative criteria.

The central legal issues addressed by the Commission were whether the proposed enterprise agreement adhered to the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to its provisions on wages, conditions, dispute resolution, and the protection of employee rights. The applicant argued that the agreement was necessary for the efficient operation of the business and would benefit both the employer and the employees by providing clear and fair terms. The Commission needed to scrutinise the content of the agreement to ensure it did not unfairly disadvantage any party and complied with the overarching principles of the Act.

The Fair Work Commission examined the agreement in detail, considering its provisions in light of the statutory requirements. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions for wages and conditions that were largely consistent with industry benchmarks and provided mechanisms for resolving workplace disputes that were fair and efficient. The Commission found that the agreement did not contain any terms that would unduly prejudice the rights of the employees or the efficient operation of the business. Consequently, the Commission approved the UGL Rail Services Pty Ltd Bassendean Enterprise Agreement 2012, finding it to be compliant with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The approval was granted subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.