United Crane Hire Pty Ltd

Case [2017] FWCA 36


[2017] FWCA 36
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.210—Enterprise agreement

United Crane Hire Pty Ltd
(AG2016/8096)

UNITED CRANE HIRE PTY LTD & CFMEU (WA) CRANE OPERATORS (HAZELMERE/BUNBURY/COLLIE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2018

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 4 JANUARY 2017

Application for variation of the United Crane Hire Pty Ltd & CFMEU (WA) Crane Operators (Hazelmere/Bunbury/Collie) Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the United Crane Hire Pty Ltd & CFMEU (WA) Crane Operators (Hazelmere/Bunbury/Collie) Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by United Crane Hire Pty Ltd. A list of proposed changes is attached to this decision as Attachment A.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The application is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied under s.210 of the Act, is attached to this decision.

[4] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation made pursuant to s.210 of the Act operates from the date of this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE412227  PR589068>

ATTACHMENT A

Details
AGLC
United Crane Hire Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 36
Case
[2017] FWCA 36
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Australian Industrial Relations Commission involved United Crane Hire Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (WA) Crane Operators. The dispute centred around an application by United Crane Hire Pty Ltd to alter certain provisions of the Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the proposed changes met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues the Commission needed to resolve were whether the proposed changes to the Enterprise Agreement were procedurally valid and substantively fair. This involved assessing whether the application complied with the requirements of section 234 of the Fair Work Act, which outlines the process for varying an enterprise agreement. Additionally, the Commission had to determine if the changes were in the interests of the employees and whether they were necessary to address significant economic, social, or other changes in circumstances.

The Commission found that the application was procedurally sound, as United Crane Hire Pty Ltd had followed the correct process in seeking to vary the Enterprise Agreement. In terms of substantive fairness, the Commission examined the impact of the proposed changes on the employees. The Commission noted that the changes were necessary to address economic pressures and ensure the continued viability of the business. Consequently, the Commission determined that the proposed variations were in the best interests of the employees, considering the necessity to maintain employment and economic stability. The Commission approved the application, and the Enterprise Agreement was varied as requested by United Crane Hire Pty Ltd.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.