| [2020] FWCA 798 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Unilever Australia Trading Limited T/A Unilever
(AG2019/4745)
APPROVAL OF UNILEVER AUSTRALIA TRADING LIMITED WEIS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 13 FEBRUARY 2020 |
Application for approval of the Unilever Australia Trading Limited Weis Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Unilever Australia Trading Limited Weis Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Unilever Australia Trading Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[4] The United Workers Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 4.1;
• Clause 4.6;
• Clause 4.7;
• Clause 5.1;
• Clause 7; and
• Schedule G.
[6] However, noting clause 1.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[7] The Agreement was approved on 13 February 2020 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 February 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 February 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507089 PR716741>
- AGLC
- Unilever Australia Trading Limited T/A Unilever [2020] FWCA 798
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 798
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement contained genuine bargaining and was free from unlawful content. The AMWU argued that specific clauses regarding redundancy payments and the definition of “employee” were not the result of genuine bargaining and were unlawful as they did not meet the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to determine if these provisions were indeed products of genuine bargaining and if they complied with the statutory requirements for fairness and legality.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the submissions and evidence presented by both parties, found that the agreement had been genuinely bargained. The Commission held that the provisions in question were not only the result of genuine bargaining but also adhered to the legislative standards of fairness. The Commission was satisfied that the parties had negotiated in good faith and that the terms of the agreement were reasonable and lawful. Consequently, the application for approval was successful, and the agreement was certified as a single-employer enterprise agreement.
In its decision, the Commission certified the Unilever Australia Trading Limited Weis Enterprise Agreement 2019 as a single-employer enterprise agreement, dismissing the objections raised by the AMWU. The Commission's decision underscored the importance of genuine bargaining in enterprise agreements and confirmed that the agreement in question met all necessary statutory requirements for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.