| [2020] FWCA 6558 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Unidex Consulting Pty Ltd T/A Frontline Human Resources
(AG2020/3549)
REGENCY SHOWER SCREENS & WARDROBES SOUTH AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020-2023
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 4 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Regency Shower Screens & Wardrobes South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Regency Shower Screens & Wardrobes South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Unidex Consulting Pty Ltd T/A Frontline Human Resources (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 4 December 2020.
[3] Subclauses 16(c), (e) and (f) appear to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES), however are remedied by the NES precedence clause in 7 of the Agreement. In particular, the evidence required in subclauses 16(c),(e) is to the satisfaction of a reasonable person, notice of absence in accordance with subclause 16(e) must be provided as soon as practicable and may be at a time after the leave has started and in relation to clause 16(f) insofar as it is inconsistent with s.102 of the Act.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 1 February 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509726 PR725192>
- AGLC
- Unidex Consulting Pty Ltd T/A Frontline Human Resources [2020] FWCA 6558
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6558
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine several key legal issues. Firstly, whether the agreement provided for the minimum entitlements as prescribed by the Fair Work Act, including minimum wages, penalties, and leave entitlements. Secondly, the court had to assess whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was genuinely intended to create a fair and equitable working environment for the employees. Thirdly, the court needed to ensure that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to public policy or that would undermine the principles of the Fair Work Act.
After reviewing the agreement and the submissions from both parties, the Fair Work Commission found that the Regency Shower Screens & Wardrobes South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 was compliant with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court confirmed that the agreement provided for all minimum entitlements and was made in good faith. Additionally, the court determined that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to public policy or undermined the principles of the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the Fair Work Commission were that the Regency Shower Screens & Wardrobes South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. This approval ensured that the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement would be binding on both the employer and the employees covered by the agreement. The decision provided clarity and certainty for the parties involved, ensuring that the enterprise agreement was fair, equitable, and compliant with the relevant legislative framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.