UHLMAN & MORTON
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 55
•24 January 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
UHLMAN & MORTON [2018] FamCA 55
[2018] FamCA 55
24 January 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Uhlman & Morton*, heard by Cronin J, the dispute concerned parenting orders and a father's application for contravention. The parties involved were the father and the mother, with the child being C, born in 2015.
The court was required to determine the terms of future contact arrangements between the father and the child, including the location and supervision of contact, and to address the father's application for contravention. The court also considered the role of Ms B, presumably a family consultant or similar professional, in facilitating and overseeing contact.
By consent of the parties, the father's application for contravention was struck out. The court ordered that certain paragraphs of previous orders made on 3 August 2017 be suspended. New contact arrangements were to commence at the D Contact Centre in Suburb E, subject to confirmation by Ms B that such arrangements were in the child's best interests. These arrangements were to be supervised by Ms B, who was also to provide directions to both parents regarding contact and the child's attendance. The father was ordered to pay the costs of Ms B, and the Children's Contact Centre was requested to provide a report. The court also directed that particulars of the obligations and consequences of contravention be set out in an attached Fact Sheet, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.
The court was required to determine the terms of future contact arrangements between the father and the child, including the location and supervision of contact, and to address the father's application for contravention. The court also considered the role of Ms B, presumably a family consultant or similar professional, in facilitating and overseeing contact.
By consent of the parties, the father's application for contravention was struck out. The court ordered that certain paragraphs of previous orders made on 3 August 2017 be suspended. New contact arrangements were to commence at the D Contact Centre in Suburb E, subject to confirmation by Ms B that such arrangements were in the child's best interests. These arrangements were to be supervised by Ms B, who was also to provide directions to both parents regarding contact and the child's attendance. The father was ordered to pay the costs of Ms B, and the Children's Contact Centre was requested to provide a report. The court also directed that particulars of the obligations and consequences of contravention be set out in an attached Fact Sheet, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
UHLMAN & MORTON [2018] FamCA 55
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0