UGL Rail Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1382


[2025] FWCA 1382

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

UGL Rail Pty Ltd

(AG2025/748)

UGL BALLARAT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA

MELBOURNE, 30 APRIL 2025

Application for approval of the UGL Ballarat Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. UGL Rail Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Application for Approval of the UGL Ballarat Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2–4 of the FW Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement was 11 October 2024 and the Agreement was made on 7 March 2025. Accordingly, both the genuine agreement and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190, as are relevant to this application for approval, has been met.

  1. The Agreement does not contain a delegates’ rights term, as required by s.205A(1) of the Act. Pursuant to s.205A(2) of the FW Act, the workplace delegates’ rights term prescribed by the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representation Rights (NERR) is unclear whether employees knew they were in a classification covered by the Agreement at the time the NERR was provided. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying material provided, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to within the meaning of s.188(5) of the FW Act.

  1. I observe that the following provision is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (the NES): 

·     Clause 13.2: Compassionate Leave

·     Clause13.10.2: Public Holiday Substitution

  1. However, noting clause 4.1 the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RBTU), the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) and the Communication, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have each given notice under s.183 of the FW Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) (and based on the declarations provided by the organisations), I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 7 May 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2027.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528794  PR786437>

ANNEXURE A:

Details
AGLC
UGL Rail Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1382
Case
[2025] FWCA 1382
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

UGL Rail Pty Ltd, a company in the rail industry, sought approval of a proposed enterprise agreement with its employees as represented by the Rail, Tram and Bus Union. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission under the Fair Work Act 2009. The proposed agreement, the UGL Ballarat Enterprise Agreement 2024, contained various terms and conditions of employment that the company intended to implement. The Union argued that the agreement adequately reflected the interests of the employees and met the requirements of the Act.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the procedural and substantive requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. Procedurally, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was made in accordance with the provisions of the Act, including the requirement for genuine bargaining and if appropriate consultation had occurred. Substantively, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were no worse off financially and, where possible, better off than the applicable award or safety net. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement complied with the good faith bargaining provisions.

After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the Commission found that the proposed agreement was made in accordance with the Act. The company demonstrated that it had engaged in genuine bargaining and had provided the necessary information to the Union to allow for meaningful consultation. The terms of the agreement were considered to be no worse off financially than the applicable award and contained provisions that were better off for employees. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the good faith bargaining provisions. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the UGL Ballarat Enterprise Agreement 2024.

The Commission's final orders were that the UGL Ballarat Enterprise Agreement 2024 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. This decision will now allow UGL Rail Pty Ltd to implement the agreed terms and conditions with its employees, as represented by the Union.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.