| [2020] FWCA 6776 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
UGL Operations and Maintenance (Services) Pty Ltd
(AG2020/3561)
UGL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SERVICES) PTY LTD HUNTER VALLEY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT CROSS | SYDNEY, 15 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the UGL Operations and Maintenance (Services) Pty Ltd Hunter Valley Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UGL Operations and Maintenance (Services) Pty Ltd Hunter Valley Enterprise Agreement 2020 (‘the Agreement’). The application was made by UGL Operations and Maintenance (Services) Pty Ltd (‘the Applicant’) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (‘the Act’). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act concerning this application for approval have been met, with the provision of written undertakings from the Applicant addressing miscellaneous matters. Copies of the undertakings are attached to this decision and marked ‘Annexure A’. I note that the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
[3] I note that clauses 16.3, 15.1 and 14.5(i) are inconsistent with the National Employment Standards. Given the National Employment Standards precedence clause at clause 1.5 of the agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this approval decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 December 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509840 PR725479>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- UGL Operations and Maintenance (Services) Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 6776
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6776
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement was in the public interest, as required by section 233(1)(b) of the Act. The applicant argued that the agreement was in the public interest because it provided for a fair and reasonable balance of interests between the employer and the employees, and it contributed to the efficient operation of the business. The applicant also argued that the agreement complied with the other criteria for approval under section 233 of the Act. The Commission considered the evidence and submissions from both parties and concluded that the agreement met all the criteria for approval.
The Commission found that the agreement was in the public interest because it provided for a fair and reasonable balance of interests between the employer and the employees. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the other criteria for approval under section 233 of the Act. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a streamlined and efficient workplace, with clear and predictable processes for resolving disputes. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable level of job security for the employees. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the agreement under section 234 of the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.