UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWCA 152


[2016] FWCA 152
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd
(AG2015/7451)

UGL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PTY LTD ALCOA LOCAL SERVICES ASSOCIATED PROJECTS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 8 JANUARY 2016

Application for approval of the UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd Alcoa Local Services and Associated Projects Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd Alcoa Local Services and Associated Projects Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union was a bargaining representative for the Agreement. The Union objected to the approval of the Agreement based on concern regarding the group of employees that voted on the proposed Agreement. The Union’s position was that there was doubt about whether two employees who voted on the proposed Agreement would be covered by the Agreement and doubt over whether ss181 and 182 of the Act have been satisfied. The Union requested to be heard on the matter.

[3] The Applicant provided evidence in relation to the two employees in question. Following receipt of this evidence, the Union withdrew its request. I am satisfied on the basis of the Applicant’s evidence that these employees were entitled to vote on the proposed Agreement in accordance with ss181 and 182 of the Act. I am satisfied that the proposed Agreement has been genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by the Agreement.

[4] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[5] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[6] The Agreement was approved on 8 January 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 15 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE417388  PR575948>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 152
Case
[2016] FWCA 152
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the UGL Operations and Maintenance Pty Ltd Alcoa Local Services and Associated Projects Enterprise Agreement 2015. The application was made under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009, which requires the agreement to be certified as "suitable for registration" before it can be registered with the Fair Work Commission. The dispute concerned the provisions of the agreement regarding wages, hours of work, and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement.

The key legal issues before the Fair Work Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was suitable for registration. The Commission considered whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both employers and employees, and whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission also considered whether the agreement provided for a streamlined process for resolving disputes between the parties.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was suitable for registration and approved it. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both employers and employees, and that it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for a streamlined process for resolving disputes between the parties, which would help to ensure that any issues that arose were resolved quickly and efficiently. The Commission approved the agreement, and it was registered with the Fair Work Commission on 29 October 2015.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.