| [2016] FWCA 5934 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
UGL Engineering Pty Limited
(AG2016/3933)
UGL ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED POWER TRANSMISSION AGREEMENT 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 23 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the UGL Engineering Pty Limited Power Transmission Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UGL Engineering Pty Limited Power Transmission Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by UGL Engineering Pty Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 August 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE420684 PR584526>
- AGLC
- UGL Engineering Pty Limited [2016] FWCA 5934
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5934
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the proposed Power Transmission Agreement 2016 was in the best interests of the creditors and stakeholders of UGL Engineering. This required an assessment of the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement, including the terms and conditions under which the assets and liabilities were to be transferred. Additionally, the court needed to ensure that the agreement complied with relevant statutory provisions and met the criteria for court approval under the Corporations Act.
The court carefully examined the evidence presented by the administrators and the parties involved, considering the commercial rationale behind the agreement and its potential impact on the creditors. It evaluated the fairness of the terms and the likelihood of the agreement achieving the best possible outcome for the company’s stakeholders. After thorough consideration, the court concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met the statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the court granted approval for the Power Transmission Agreement 2016, enabling the restructuring process to proceed as planned.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.