UDALL & OAKS

In the matter of *Udall & Oaks*, the parties brought an application before Hannam J concerning the admissibility of expert reports. The dispute centred on whether the reports of Dr B and Dr C should be admitted as evidence in the proceedings.

The primary legal issue before the Court was the admissibility of the expert reports. This required the Court to consider the relevant rules of evidence and any specific legislative provisions governing the admission of expert testimony in the context of the proceedings.

Hannam J determined that both the report of Dr B and the report of Dr C were admissible. The Court's reasoning and the specific legal principles applied are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the requirements for admitting these expert reports were met.

The Court ordered that the report of Dr B be admitted in the proceedings and further ordered that the report of Dr C be admitted in the proceedings.