Turner v Bulletin Newspaper Co Pty Ltd
Case
•
[1974] HCA 25
•25 June 1974
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Turner v Bulletin Newspaper Co Pty Ltd [1974] HCA 25
[1974] HCA 25
25 June 1974
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Turner, a former Minister for the Interior, brought an action for defamation against Bulletin Newspaper Co Pty Ltd. The dispute concerned an article published by the defendant in *The Bulletin* magazine, which the plaintiff alleged was defamatory of him. The case was heard by the High Court of Australia.
The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the article, in its natural and ordinary meaning, was capable of conveying a defamatory imputation concerning the plaintiff. This involved an assessment of how a reasonable reader would understand the words used in the publication.
The High Court, by majority, held that the article was not capable of conveying a defamatory meaning. The judges considered the context in which the words were published and concluded that a reasonable reader would not have understood the article to be asserting that the plaintiff had acted dishonestly or improperly in his capacity as Minister. The principles of defamation law concerning the ordinary and natural meaning of words and the role of the jury in determining such meaning were applied.
The appeal was dismissed.
The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the article, in its natural and ordinary meaning, was capable of conveying a defamatory imputation concerning the plaintiff. This involved an assessment of how a reasonable reader would understand the words used in the publication.
The High Court, by majority, held that the article was not capable of conveying a defamatory meaning. The judges considered the context in which the words were published and concluded that a reasonable reader would not have understood the article to be asserting that the plaintiff had acted dishonestly or improperly in his capacity as Minister. The principles of defamation law concerning the ordinary and natural meaning of words and the role of the jury in determining such meaning were applied.
The appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Hoh v Frosthollow Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 77
Cases Citing This Decision
44
Perera v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd
[2017] NSWCA 19
Sigley and De Santis & Ors (No 5)
[2020] FamCA 968
Carswell v KBRV Resort Operations Pty Ltd
[2017] QSC 239
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Wallace v Hermans
[1974] HCA 42
Cousins Securities Pty Ltd v CEC Group Ltd
[2007] QCA 192