Turn Key Distribution Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2010] FWA 6987
•21 SEPTEMBER 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Turn Key Distribution Pty Ltd [2010] FWA 6987
[2010] FWA 6987
21 SEPTEMBER 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The dispute between Turn Key Distribution Pty Ltd and its employees was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The employees contested the terms and conditions outlined in the Turn Key Distribution Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2010. The key issue before the commission was whether the enterprise agreement contained valid and enforceable terms and conditions of employment, specifically addressing the payment of wages and classification of employees.
The commission examined the process by which the enterprise agreement was negotiated and agreed upon, and the extent to which it adhered to the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. The employees argued that the terms were not fairly negotiated and did not accurately reflect the terms agreed upon. The company contended that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that the terms were reasonable and fair.
The commission found that the negotiation process was flawed and that the terms of the agreement did not accurately reflect the terms agreed upon by the parties. The commission held that the agreement was not valid and enforceable, and made orders to this effect. The employees were entitled to be paid at a higher rate of pay and to be reclassified accordingly. The company was ordered to pay compensation to the affected employees for the underpayment of wages.
The commission examined the process by which the enterprise agreement was negotiated and agreed upon, and the extent to which it adhered to the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. The employees argued that the terms were not fairly negotiated and did not accurately reflect the terms agreed upon. The company contended that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that the terms were reasonable and fair.
The commission found that the negotiation process was flawed and that the terms of the agreement did not accurately reflect the terms agreed upon by the parties. The commission held that the agreement was not valid and enforceable, and made orders to this effect. The employees were entitled to be paid at a higher rate of pay and to be reclassified accordingly. The company was ordered to pay compensation to the affected employees for the underpayment of wages.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collective Agreement
-
Unfair Dismissal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Lutanda Children's Services [2010] FWA 7247
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Kralage Pty Ltd ATF Ainsworth Family Trust
[2010] FWA 7520
Lutanda Children's Services
[2010] FWA 7247
Kralage Pty Ltd ATF Ainsworth Family Trust
[2010] FWA 7520
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Or-Tak Pty Ltd T/A Or-Tak Pty Ltd
[2010] FWA 5235
Margin Brothers Pty Ltd T/A Campbell IGA Friendly Grocer
[2010] FWA 2105
Shaydi Pty Ltd
[2010] FWA 4262