DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd
(AG2016/923)

TT LOGISTICS (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD SOUTH AUSTRALIA WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2016

Storage services
COMMISSIONER ROE	MELBOURNE, 12 MAY 2016

Application for approval of the TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd South Australia Workplace Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd South Australia Workplace Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 12 May 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2019

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd sought approval of a workplace agreement with its employees. The dispute involved the proposed terms of employment, specifically regarding shift patterns, overtime, and the classification of roles. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the proposed terms of the workplace agreement were genuinely negotiated and met the criteria for approval, including provisions on shift patterns, overtime entitlements, and classification of employee roles. The Commission needed to assess whether the agreement provided employees with at least the protections of the applicable award or registered agreement, and whether it facilitated a simpler and more flexible workplace.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement did not provide employees with protections equivalent to the relevant award or registered agreement, particularly in relation to overtime entitlements. The Commission also found that the proposed shift patterns did not adequately protect employee rest periods. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the agreement. The Commission emphasised that the proposed terms failed to meet the statutory criteria for approval and did not provide a safety net for employees.

The Commission did not approve the TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd South Australia Workplace Agreement 2016, effectively denying the employer's application. The Commission's decision highlighted the need for workplace agreements to comply with the statutory requirements and provide adequate protections for employees.

TT Logistics (Australasia) Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established