Tsekouras v Evangelinidis S187/2000
Case
•
[2000] HCATrans 673
•7 November 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tsekouras v Evangelinidis S187/2000 [2000] HCATrans 673
[2000] HCATrans 673
7 November 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this proceeding were Tsekouras and Evangelinidis. The dispute concerned an application for leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The application was heard by Gummow J in chambers.
The primary legal issue before Gummow J was whether the applicant had demonstrated that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Victoria involved a question of law that, in the public interest, it was desirable for the High Court to review. This required consideration of whether the case raised a matter of general importance or a point of law that had not been settled by the High Court or was in doubt.
Gummow J considered the nature of the dispute and the arguments presented by the applicant. His Honour applied the principles governing the grant of special leave to appeal, which require a strong arguable case and a demonstration that the appeal is in the public interest. After reviewing the material, Gummow J concluded that the applicant had not satisfied the threshold for the grant of special leave.
Special leave to appeal was refused.
The primary legal issue before Gummow J was whether the applicant had demonstrated that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Victoria involved a question of law that, in the public interest, it was desirable for the High Court to review. This required consideration of whether the case raised a matter of general importance or a point of law that had not been settled by the High Court or was in doubt.
Gummow J considered the nature of the dispute and the arguments presented by the applicant. His Honour applied the principles governing the grant of special leave to appeal, which require a strong arguable case and a demonstration that the appeal is in the public interest. After reviewing the material, Gummow J concluded that the applicant had not satisfied the threshold for the grant of special leave.
Special leave to appeal was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Insolvency
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0