Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Sydney v Hogan
Case
•
[2001] NSWCA 381
•31 October 2001
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Sydney v Hogan [2001] NSWCA 381
[2001] NSWCA 381
31 October 2001
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Sydney (appellants) appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against a jury award of damages granted to Mr Hogan (respondent) in an action for negligence. The dispute concerned injuries sustained by Mr Hogan when a teacher, employed by the appellants, allegedly negligently strapped him. The jury had awarded a significant sum for general damages.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the jury's award of general damages was excessive to the extent that it should be reassessed. A further issue was whether, pursuant to section 107 of the *Supreme Court Act*, a new trial, if ordered, should be restricted to any particular head of damage.
The Court of Appeal found that the jury's award for general damages was demonstrably excessive and could not stand. Applying the principles for reassessment of damages, the Court concluded that it was appropriate to substitute its own assessment for the jury's award. The Court also determined that, in the circumstances, a new trial limited to a specific head of damage was not warranted, and the appeal should be allowed to the extent of reassessing the general damages.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the jury's award of general damages was excessive to the extent that it should be reassessed. A further issue was whether, pursuant to section 107 of the *Supreme Court Act*, a new trial, if ordered, should be restricted to any particular head of damage.
The Court of Appeal found that the jury's award for general damages was demonstrably excessive and could not stand. Applying the principles for reassessment of damages, the Court concluded that it was appropriate to substitute its own assessment for the jury's award. The Court also determined that, in the circumstances, a new trial limited to a specific head of damage was not warranted, and the appeal should be allowed to the extent of reassessing the general damages.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Negligence & Tort
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Damages
-
Negligence
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
-
Duty of Care
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
McKay v Commissioner of Main Roads [2013] WASCA 135
Cases Citing This Decision
11
Hillig v Battaglia
[2018] NSWCA 67
Hillig v Battaglia
[2018] NSWCA 67
Croucher v Cachia
[2016] NSWCA 132
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
Anderson v Hotel Capital Trading Pty Limited
[2003] NSWSC 1195
Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd
[1993] HCA 31
Anderson v Hotel Capital Trading Pty Limited
[2003] NSWSC 1195