[2013] FWCA 2560 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Trustee for Ernest Hillier Unit T/A Ernest Hillier Pty Ltd
(AG2013/946)
ERNEST HILLIER’S ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 9 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Ernest Hillier’s Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ernest Hillier’s Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Trustee for Ernest Hillier Unit T/A Ernest Hillier Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. However, having considered the explanation provided by the Applicant, pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 May 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE400967 PR536034>
- AGLC
- Trustee for Ernest Hillier Unit T/A Ernest Hillier Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2560
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2560
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement had been made in accordance with the procedural requirements of the Act, and whether it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions as stipulated by the Act. The Commission had to assess the fairness of the agreement, including whether it provided for a proper balance between the interests of the employer and the employees. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement had been made free from any undue influence or coercion.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the application for approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2013 was valid and should be registered. The Commission concluded that the agreement had been made in compliance with the procedural requirements of the Act, and it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for a fair balance of the interests of both parties and had been made without any undue influence or coercion. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement for registration.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Ernest Hillier Enterprise Agreement 2013 be registered, effective from the date of the decision. The registration of the agreement meant that it would become a legally binding document governing the employment terms and conditions for the relevant employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.