TRIANGLE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (Migration)
Case
•
[2020] AATA 2846
•2 June 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
TRIANGLE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (Migration) [2020] AATA 2846
[2020] AATA 2846
2 June 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by Triangle Australia Pty Ltd for approval of a nomination under the Temporary Residence Transition stream. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal was required to determine whether the applicant met the requirements of regulation 5.19(3) of the Migration Regulations 1994 for the nomination to be approved.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the nominating business, Triangle Australia Pty Ltd, had demonstrated sufficient financial capacity to employ the nominated individual on a full-time basis for at least two years, as required by regulation 5.19(3)(d). The Tribunal also considered whether the applicant had provided all necessary information within the prescribed period to satisfy the criteria for the nomination.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision to refuse the nomination. It found that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the financial capacity of the business to meet the nominated salary of $54,000 per annum, plus superannuation contributions, for the required two-year period. While some financial statements and employment contracts were provided, they were not considered adequate to establish the business's capacity to sustain the employment for the stipulated duration. The Tribunal noted that the applicant had not sought to satisfy the criteria for the Direct Entry nomination stream, and therefore, had not met the requirements of regulation 5.19(4).
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the nominating business, Triangle Australia Pty Ltd, had demonstrated sufficient financial capacity to employ the nominated individual on a full-time basis for at least two years, as required by regulation 5.19(3)(d). The Tribunal also considered whether the applicant had provided all necessary information within the prescribed period to satisfy the criteria for the nomination.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision to refuse the nomination. It found that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the financial capacity of the business to meet the nominated salary of $54,000 per annum, plus superannuation contributions, for the required two-year period. While some financial statements and employment contracts were provided, they were not considered adequate to establish the business's capacity to sustain the employment for the stipulated duration. The Tribunal noted that the applicant had not sought to satisfy the criteria for the Direct Entry nomination stream, and therefore, had not met the requirements of regulation 5.19(4).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
[2002] FCA 617
Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2012] FMCA 28
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18