TREVOR VIDEAN SENTON BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY v FRANCIS JAMES STEEN
Case
•
[2012] ACTSC 127
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
TREVOR VIDEAN SENTON BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY v FRANCIS JAMES STEEN [2012] ACTSC 127
[2012] ACTSC 127
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case involves an action for damages for personal injury arising out of a collision between a motor vehicle and a pedestrian. The collision occurred at about 6.30 pm on Thursday 24 June 2004 in Kendal Street, Cowra, New South Wales. Negligence on the part of the driver is admitted. The driver asserts that the pedestrian was guilty of contributory negligence. The court had to decide whether the pedestrian was guilty of contributory negligence and if so, how liability should be apportioned between the parties. The court considered the evidence and found that the pedestrian failed to keep a proper lookout and that he failed to take the care for his own safety which a reasonable man in his position would have taken. The driver's negligence was more culpable than that of the pedestrian, and the court found that an appropriate apportionment of liability is 70% to the driver and 30% to the pedestrian. The court ordered that the plaintiff's damages be reduced by 30% for contributory negligence and that the further hearing of the action be stood over for the assessment of damages.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tort Law
-
Negligence
Legal Concepts
-
Causation
-
Contributory Negligence
-
Apportionment of Liability
-
Duty of Care
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Steen v Senton [2017] ACTCA 5
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Steen v Senton
[2017] ACTCA 5
Steen v Senton
[2017] ACTCA 5
Steen v Senton
[2015] ACTCA 57
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Mackenzie v The Nominal Defendant
[2005] NSWCA 180
Pennington v Norris
[1956] HCA 26
Pennington v Norris
[1956] HCA 26