Treloar Constructions Pty Ltd v McMillan
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 302
•04 November 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Treloar Constructions Pty Limited v McMillan [2016] NSWCA 302
[2016] NSWCA 302
04 November 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Treloar Constructions Pty Ltd v McMillan*, the appellant company sought to appeal a decision, and the respondent applied for security for costs of the appeal. The respondent also sought a stay of execution and enforcement of existing costs orders made against the appellant.
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether there was reason to believe the appellant company would be unable to pay the costs of the appeal, thereby justifying an order for security for costs under section 1335(1) of the *Corporations Act 2001* (Cth), and whether a stay of execution of the costs orders should be granted, and if so, on what conditions.
The Court reasoned that the appellant's lack of property, low share capital, and absence of financial records in evidence supported the existence of credible testimony that the company might be unable to pay the costs of the appeal. Consequently, the Court ordered the appellant to provide security for the respondent's costs of the appeal in the sum of $75,000, either by payment into court or an irrevocable bank guarantee. Furthermore, the Court granted a stay of execution and enforcement of the existing costs orders, conditional upon the appellant paying $225,000 into a joint controlled monies account, until seven days after judgment on the appeal or further order.
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether there was reason to believe the appellant company would be unable to pay the costs of the appeal, thereby justifying an order for security for costs under section 1335(1) of the *Corporations Act 2001* (Cth), and whether a stay of execution of the costs orders should be granted, and if so, on what conditions.
The Court reasoned that the appellant's lack of property, low share capital, and absence of financial records in evidence supported the existence of credible testimony that the company might be unable to pay the costs of the appeal. Consequently, the Court ordered the appellant to provide security for the respondent's costs of the appeal in the sum of $75,000, either by payment into court or an irrevocable bank guarantee. Furthermore, the Court granted a stay of execution and enforcement of the existing costs orders, conditional upon the appellant paying $225,000 into a joint controlled monies account, until seven days after judgment on the appeal or further order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Regional Architects Pty Ltd v Coffs Harbour City Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 106
Cases Citing This Decision
29
Litigation Fund WCX Pty Ltd v Mitchell (No 3)
[2025] NSWCA 67
Litigation Fund WCX Pty Ltd v Darren Mitchell
[2025] NSWCA 27
Flynn v PPK Mining Equipment Pty Ltd
[2023] NSWCA 151
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
2
HP Mercantile Pty Ltd v Dierickx
[2013] NSWCA 87
Livingspring Pty Ltd v Kliger Partners
[2008] VSCA 93
Cited Sections