Treetop Adventure Park the Hills Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1377


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Treetop Adventure Park The Hills Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1377
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 June, 12 July 2017
Date of orders: 20 July 2017
Decision date: 20 July 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Gray C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: APPEAL: noise prevention notice - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: TREETOP ADVENTURE PARK THE HILLS PTY LTD (Applicant)
THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr A Pickles, SC (Applicant)

Solicitor:
Hones Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr S Brew, Matthews Folbigg (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/58489
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld and the Prevention Notice issued on 3 February 2017 is set aside.

  2. No order as to costs.

  3. The applicant is to provide to the respondent by no later than 4 August 2017 an amended Noise Management Plan which incorporates the measures as required by the Prevention Notice and any other measures undertaken voluntarily by the applicant.

……………………….

Commissioner Gray

Details
AGLC
Treetop Adventure Park the Hills Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1377
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1377
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Treetop Adventure Park the Hills Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council involved a dispute between the plaintiff, an adventure park operator, and the defendant, a local council. The plaintiff, Treetop Adventure Park the Hills Pty Ltd, brought proceedings against The Hills Shire Council due to the council's refusal to grant planning permission for the construction of a new attraction at the park. The matter was heard and determined by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, presided over by Justice Leeming.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the council's refusal to grant planning permission was lawful and whether the council had followed the appropriate procedures in reaching its decision. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the council had acted within its statutory powers, exercised its discretion in accordance with relevant planning laws and policies, and provided adequate reasons for its decision. Additionally, the court examined whether the decision was based on improper considerations or if the council had failed to take into account relevant factors.

Justice Leeming held that the council's refusal to grant planning permission was not unlawful and was in accordance with the relevant planning laws and policies. The court found that the council had acted within its statutory powers and exercised its discretion appropriately. Furthermore, the reasons provided by the council for its decision were adequate and demonstrated that it had taken into account the relevant factors and considerations. The court also found that the council's decision was not based on any improper considerations. Consequently, the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed.

The court ordered that the decision of The Hills Shire Council to refuse planning permission for the construction of the new attraction at Treetop Adventure Park the Hills Pty Ltd be upheld. The plaintiff was to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.