| [2022] FWCA 3939 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Ltd
(AG2022/4503)
Treasury Wine Estates Eastern Australia Vineyards Enterprise Agreement 2021 – 2024
| Wine industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 10 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Treasury Wine Estates Eastern Australia Vineyards Enterprise Agreement 2021-2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Treasury Wine Estates Eastern Australia Vineyards Enterprise Agreement 2021-2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Australian Workers Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518122 PR747767>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Ltd [2022] FWCA 3939
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3939
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the application was appropriately lodged and if the agreement satisfied all statutory requirements for registration. Specifically, the court needed to ascertain whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and if it met the criteria for endorsement under the Fair Work Act 2009. Furthermore, the court examined whether the application process adhered to the procedural fairness standards set by the Fair Work Commission.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the application was procedurally valid and that the agreement met all necessary statutory requirements. The court found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and was in compliance with the Act. The Commission also ruled that the applicant had fulfilled all procedural obligations, ensuring fairness throughout the process. Consequently, the application was approved, and the agreement was registered, thereby binding the employees covered by the agreement to its terms. The Commission's decision was based on a thorough review of the evidence presented and a careful application of the relevant legal principles.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.