Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 1012


[2024] FWC 1012

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v

Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd

(B2024/446)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 17 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd (Viva or Employer).

  1. On 16 April 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Robert Taylor, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the TWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Viva, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 1 May 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. The structure of the draft order has been amended to reflect the Fair Work Commission’s standard template.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR773610.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] [2023] FWC 1351.

[2] This is, in effect, nine (9) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application. The Commission has removed reference to the time specified for the closure of the voting on the basis that the Act requires the date by which the voting is to close to be specified, and this includes the whole of the day.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR773611>

Details
AGLC
Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1012
Case
[2024] FWC 1012
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Transport Workers' Union of Australia applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd did not object to the application. Consequently, the Deputy President determined the matter without a hearing, based on the provided documentation, including a declaration from an organiser of the union, indicating the union's genuine efforts to reach an agreement with the employer.

The court had to decide whether the union had met all the requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act. This included verifying that a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement existed and that all conditions under section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. The union had demonstrated its genuine attempts to reach an agreement with the employer, and the employer had not contested the application. The ballot was to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, an approved agent under section 468A of the Act.

The Deputy President concluded that the union had satisfied the requirements for a ballot order. The ballot period was set to close on 1 May 2024, effectively nine working days from the date of the order. The date specified includes the entire day of closure. The order was structured according to the Fair Work Commission’s standard template. The matter was to be assigned to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference, with directions to ensure the parties were prepared for meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.