| [2023] FWC 1242 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
v
K & S Freighters Pty Ltd T/A K & S Freighters Pty Ltd
(B2023/495)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 26 MAY 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of K & S Freighters Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of K & S Freighters Pty Ltd (Respondent).
On 26 May 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Commerford of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An order has been separately issued in PR762545.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR762544>
- AGLC
- Transport Workers' Union of Australia v K & S Freighters Pty Ltd T/A K & S Freighters Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1242
- Case
- [2023] FWC 1242
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the union had satisfied the conditions set forth in section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and if the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the respondent during bargaining. The union submitted a declaration from Mr. Commerford, affirming that they had indeed been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the respondent.
The Deputy President, after reviewing the material provided, was satisfied that the union had fulfilled the notification time requirement and had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the respondent. Based on these findings, the court granted the union's application for a protected action ballot order. The decision was made without a hearing, and an order was issued separately in PR762545.
The final orders of the court were to grant the union's application for a protected action ballot order, allowing them to proceed with the ballot among the employees of K & S Freighters Pty Ltd. The decision was rendered on the basis of the submitted material and the lack of objection from the respondent.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.