| [2023] FWC 396 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
v
Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd T/A Cleanaway
(B2023/116)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 17 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd T/A Cleanaway - Cleanaway SEMTS & MRL Enterprise Agreement 2017.
This is an application by the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd T/A Cleanaway (the Respondent).
The Respondent initially raised concerns in relation to the form and content of the order, specifically the industrial action identified in questions 6 and 7 of the draft order accompanying the application. I determined a Mention should be conducted, during which I discussed these concerns with the parties and other matters subsequently raised. During the Mention, the Respondent advised that it did not intend to pursue its objections further.
With the Mention having resolved the various matters raised, I have proceeded to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Greg Fleming of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An order has been separately issued in PR750690.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR750689>
- AGLC
- Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd T/A Cleanaway [2023] FWC 396
- Case
- [2023] FWC 396
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the Union had met the prerequisites for a protected action ballot as stipulated in the Fair Work Act. This included determining if the Union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Cleanaway and if the notification period for the proposed agreement had been appropriately observed. The Commission also needed to consider whether the proposed industrial action was valid under the Act.
The Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission, Clancy, resolved the matter based on the documentation submitted, including a declaration by Mr. Greg Fleming of the Union. The declaration outlined the steps taken by the Union in its bargaining efforts with Cleanaway, confirming that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement. The Deputy President concluded that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act were satisfied and that there was a valid notification period for the proposed agreement. Consequently, the objections raised by Cleanaway were deemed no longer relevant, and the Commission proceeded to grant the Union's application for a protected action ballot.
In summary, the Fair Work Commission granted the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia's application for a protected action ballot concerning the employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd. The Commission found that the Union had fulfilled the necessary conditions under the Fair Work Act, including demonstrating genuine bargaining efforts and adhering to the notification period for the proposed agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.