[2013] FWCA 2051 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Transport Workers' Union of Australia
(AG2013/657)
DGL (AUST) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (STRAMIT OPERATIONS) QUEENSLAND 2013
Road transport industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 4 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Stramit Operations) Queensland 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd Enteprise Agreement (Stramit Operations) Queensland 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185(1A) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement has been made by DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd, an employer covered by the Agreement, and is a greenfields agreement made pursuant to s.172(4).
[2] The Agreement is made with the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia pursuant to s.172(2)(b) of the Act.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular I am satisfied that the employee organisation is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement, in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 11 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE400616 PR535392>
- AGLC
- Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 2051
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2051
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the agreement complied with the statutory minimum standards, and if it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The Union argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission found that while most provisions of the agreement were acceptable, there were some concerns regarding the treatment of new employees. Specifically, the agreement provided less favourable terms and conditions for new employees compared to existing employees, which was not in line with the statutory minimum entitlements.
After considering the arguments presented by both parties, the Commission determined that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission found that the less favourable treatment of new employees contravened the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The Commission did not grant the requested approval and the agreement remained unauthorised.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.