[2014] FWCA 3239 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2014/5186)
TRANSPACIFIC REFINERS RUTHERFORD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Waste management industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 19 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Transpacific Refiners Rutherford Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Transpacific Refiners Rutherford Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On reviewing the application clarification was sought from the Applicant about the hours of work and consultation provisions in the Agreement. Confirmation was also sought about when the Notice of Employee Representational Rights was provided to employees.
[3] The Applicant has provided an undertaking in response indicating that the intent of clause 10.3 of the Agreement is that where employees work a 38 hour week their hours of work will not exceed 152 hours in 28 consecutive days. A copy of this undertaking has also been provided to the Australian Workers’ Union who are a bargaining representative for employees covered by the proposed Agreement. I have accepted that undertaking which is attached to this decision and will now form part of the Agreement.
[4] The Applicant’s response also confirms that the Notice of Employee Representational Rights was provided to the employees intended to be covered by the proposed Agreement on 26 November 2013, almost 4 months prior to the date when the employees were asked to vote on the proposed Agreement.
[5] I am also satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and s.190 that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 January 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Attachment A:
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE408164 PR550635>
- AGLC
- Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3239
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3239
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly sections concerning the protection of employees' rights and interests. This involved an assessment of whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including provisions on pay rates, classification, and other employment terms. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement met the procedural requirements for negotiation and agreement.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did not adequately protect employees' pay and conditions, particularly in relation to overtime and penalty rates. The Commission noted that the agreement lacked specific provisions for overtime payments and did not sufficiently address the classification of employees. Furthermore, the process of negotiation did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act, as the union had not been adequately involved in the bargaining process. As a result, the Commission refused to approve the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Transpacific Refiners Rutherford Enterprise Agreement 2014 be not approved. The Commission directed the parties to engage in further negotiations to address the deficiencies identified in the agreement and to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.