| [2015] FWCA 4935 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3305)
Waste management industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 21 JULY 2015 |
Application for termination of the Quantum Environmental Services Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] On 14 July 2015 Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Quantum Environmental Services Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.226 of the Act for the termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date have been met. Accordingly, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 20 July 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE893003 PR569610 >
- AGLC
- Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4935
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4935
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the changes in the applicant's business were significant enough to warrant termination of the enterprise agreement and whether the agreement remained applicable in its current form. The Commission considered the nature and extent of the changes to the business, the implications for the employees covered by the agreement, and the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant needed to demonstrate that the changes were fundamental and that the agreement was no longer fit for purpose.
After examining the evidence, the Commission found that the changes in the applicant's business were indeed significant and fundamental. The disposal of the waste management operations constituted a major shift in the nature of the business, and the remaining operations were sufficiently different from those covered by the agreement. The Commission concluded that the enterprise agreement was no longer applicable and ordered its termination. Consequently, the Commission dismissed the application for termination as it had already achieved its purpose by the time of the hearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.