| [2015] FWCA 5092 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3721)
TRANSPACIFIC INDUSTRIES TECHNICAL SERVICES YATALA MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 27 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Transpacific Industries Technical Services Yatala Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Transpacific Industries Technical Services Yatala Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 3 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE414979 PR569829>
- AGLC
- Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5092
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5092
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for the proper classification and remuneration of employees, if it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. The Commission had to carefully examine the agreement's provisions, particularly those relating to the classification of employees, to ensure it met the criteria for approval.
The Commission found that the agreement, while generally compliant with the Fair Work Act, contained certain provisions that required amendment to meet the necessary legal standards. After considering submissions from both parties, the Commission determined that with specific modifications, the agreement could be approved. These modifications primarily related to ensuring that the classification and remuneration of employees were clearly and accurately defined. The Commission then issued a modified approval for the agreement, subject to these amendments being implemented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.