Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 53


[2013] FWCA 53

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2012/13864)

WESTERN RESOURCE RECOVERY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Waste management industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY

PERTH, 3 JANUARY 2013

Application for approval of the Western Resource Recovery Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Western Resource Recovery Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE899160  PR532876>

Details
AGLC
Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 53
Case
[2013] FWCA 53
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd applied for approval of the Western Resource Recovery Enterprise Agreement 2012, which was to be registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicants argued that the agreement provided for the appropriate terms and conditions for employees within the relevant enterprise. The respondents, various employees, contested the application, arguing that the agreement did not fairly represent the employees' interests.

The legal issues before the court were whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees and whether it had been genuinely agreed upon by the parties involved. The court examined the process by which the agreement was formed, the terms of the agreement, and the representation of the employees' interests. The applicants had to demonstrate that the agreement was the product of genuine bargaining and that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions.

The court found that the agreement had been genuinely agreed upon and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The court was satisfied that the bargaining process was conducted in good faith and that the agreement reflected a fair representation of the employees' interests. The court took into account the complexity of the enterprise and the nature of the bargaining, as well as the absence of any evidence to suggest that the agreement was unfair or unreasonable. Consequently, the court approved the agreement for registration.

The final orders of the court were that the Western Resource Recovery Enterprise Agreement 2012 be approved for registration under the Fair Work Act 2009, and that the application by Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd be granted. The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the approval of enterprise agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.