[2013] FWCA 384 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2013/4223)
CLEANAWAY MOONEE VALLEY DEPOT (MUNICIPAL) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Waste management industry | |
COMMISSIONER CRIBB | MELBOURNE, 18 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Cleanaway Moonee Valley Depot (Municipal) Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cleanaway Moonee Valley Depot (Municipal) Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved in Chambers on 18 January 2013 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899419 PR533265>
- AGLC
- Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 384
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 384
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the enterprise agreement was in accordance with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. The union argued that the agreement did not adequately protect the rights and conditions of the employees, particularly in relation to shift patterns, overtime, and leave entitlements. The court was required to assess whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it met the procedural requirements for approval.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was procedurally sound and substantively fair. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties, including the impact of the agreement on the employees’ working conditions and the broader economic context. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and that it did not disadvantage the employees to an unacceptable degree. As a result, the court approved the enterprise agreement, paving the way for its implementation.
The final orders of the court included the approval of the Cleanaway Moonee Valley Depot (Municipal) Enterprise Agreement 2012, with the conditions that any disputes arising from the agreement would be referred to the Fair Work Commission for resolution. The union's objections were dismissed, and the agreement was set to take effect as per its terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.