[2013] FWCA 1708 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited
(AG2013/5612)
TRANSFIELD SERVICES LIMITED (PROJECT WORK-KURNELL REFINERY) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2016
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER CARGILL | SYDNEY, 25 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of the Transfield Services Limited (Project Work - Kurnell Refinery) Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Transfield Services Limited (Project Work - Kurnell Refinery) Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited. The agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act I am satisfied that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 April 2013. The nominal expiry date is 31 May 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400367 PR534971>
- AGLC
- Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited [2013] FWCA 1708
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1708
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement contained terms that unfairly disadvantaged employees, and whether it complied with the "better off overall test" as stipulated in the Fair Work Act. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and if it provided for a fair process for resolving disputes. Additionally, the Commission examined if the agreement adequately protected employee rights and interests, particularly given the specialised nature of the Kurnell Refinery project work.
In its decision, the Commission found that the proposed agreement largely met the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and that it was likely to result in employees being better off overall when compared to the applicable awards and conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was made in good faith and provided adequate mechanisms for dispute resolution. After careful consideration of all submissions and evidence, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, recognising its potential to provide a fair and balanced outcome for both the employer and employees involved in the Kurnell Refinery project.
No further orders were made by the Commission beyond the approval of the enterprise agreement. The decision underscores the importance of achieving a balance between the interests of employers and employees when negotiating and approving enterprise agreements, particularly in specialised industry contexts such as the Kurnell Refinery project.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.