[2014] FWCA 3790
The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 6 June 2014.
The date “5 May 2014” in paragraph two [2] has been amended to read “5 June 2014”.
Rachel Wong
Associate to Commissioner Roberts
Dated 6 June 2014
[2014] FWCA 3790 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited
(AG2014/1179)
TRANSFIELD SERVICES LIMITED (MAINTENANCE WORK - BARL) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2016
Rail industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 6 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the Transfield Services Limited (Maintenance Work - BARL) Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Transfield Services Limited (Maintenance Work - BARL) Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited (the Company). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On 5 June 2014 an undertaking was provided by Mr J Lee, the Company’s Executive Manager Industrial Relations, in relation to clause 21.5 (Cashing Out of Annual Leave) of the Agreement. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Company’s undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision at Annexure A and forms part of the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408502 PR551556>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 3790
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3790
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including whether it provided for the minimum terms and conditions of employment and whether it had been made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act. The union argued that the agreement did not provide for adequate terms and conditions for employees and that it had not been made in accordance with the Act. Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met all the requirements of the Act.
The commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act and was fair and reasonable. The commission noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits for employees, including pay rates, leave entitlements, and conditions of work. The commission also found that the agreement had been made in accordance with the Act and that the union's opposition was not well founded. The commission approved the agreement under section 235 of the Act.
The final orders of the commission were that the Transfield Services Limited (Maintenance Work - BARL) Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2016 be approved as a registered agreement under section 179 of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was to be registered on the register of approved agreements maintained by the commission. The union's application for an extension of time to appeal the decision was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.