| [2016] FWCA 7404 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd
(AG2016/5299)
TRANSDEV SYDNEY PTY LTD (LIGHT RAIL) - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2017
Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL | SYDNEY, 19 OCTOBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd (Light Rail) - Enterprise Agreement 2015-2017
[1] An application has been made by Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd (the applicant) for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd (Light Rail) - Enterprise Agreement 2015-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement covers employees of the applicant who are employed as light rail drivers, operational controllers, authorised officers, customer service officers and trainers. As per the requirement under s.186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.
[3] The Australian Rail, Tram & Bus Industry Union (RTBU) was an employee organisation involved in the agreement making process as a bargaining representative. The RTBU has filed a statutory declaration (F18) stating that it supports the approval of the Agreement.
Consultation clause
[4] The consultation clause in the Agreement does not meet the requirements under s.205 of the Act, because it does not provide for a consultation process in relation to a change to regular rosters or ordinary hours of work.
[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model flexibility term at Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 will be taken to be a term of the Agreement and is attached at Annexure A of this decision.
Shift workers
[6] The Commission wrote to the applicant noting that the Agreement definition of a shift worker is not consistent with the definition under the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 (the Award), being the Award that covers the employees who would be covered by the Agreement. The Commission was concerned that under the Agreement shift workers may not be entitled to the additional week of annual leave pursuant to s.87(1)(b) of the Act.
[7] The applicant responded by providing an undertaking that the definition of a shift worker under the Award will be applied, and shift workers will be entitled to an additional week of annual leave in accordance with the National Employment Standards (NES).
Part time employees
[8] The Commission wrote to the applicant with the concern that the Agreement does not require the employer and part time employees to agree upon the hours and days of work at the commencement of a part time employee’s employment. This is a requirement under the Award.
[9] The applicant has provided an undertaking to address this concern. Under the Agreement part time employees will, upon commencement of employment, be provided with written confirmation of their roster pattern. Any variation to that pattern will be confirmed with the employee in writing, and I note that the model consultation clause applies when there is a change to regular rosters or ordinary hours of work.
Better off overall test (BOOT)
[10] With respect to the better off overall test (BOOT) under s.186 of the Act, the terms and conditions under the Agreement are overall more beneficial than under the Award, which is the relevant instrument for the purposes of the BOOT. Under the Agreement some Award entitlements have been reduced, including the casual loading, however the Agreement provides base rates of pay that are significantly higher for all classifications than the Award.
Conclusion
[11] Taking into account the higher rates of pay and other more beneficial entitlements under the Agreement, and balancing these benefits with the terms of the Agreement that are less beneficial than the Award, I am satisfied that employees will be better off overall under the Agreement.
Undertakings
[12] The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement and a copy is marked Annexure B. The undertakings are not so substantial that if asked to vote again the employees who voted would not approve the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the undertakings do not result in a substantial change to the Agreement, as per s.190(3)(b) of the Act.
[13] The RTBU has stated in its F18 that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this employee organisation.
[14] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[15] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1), the Agreement will operate 7 days from approval. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE421688 PR586440>
Annexure A
Annexure B
- AGLC
- Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 7404
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 7404
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment of the relevant employees in a fair and reasonable manner, and whether it complied with the provisions of the Act that govern the process for making and approving enterprise agreements.
The Commission found that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval. It provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and it was made in accordance with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The agreement included provisions for wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions that the Commission considered to be fair and reasonable. Furthermore, the process by which the agreement was negotiated and agreed upon complied with the statutory requirements, including the provision of relevant information to the employees and the opportunity for them to be represented in the negotiations.
Accordingly, the Commission approved the Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd (Light Rail) - Enterprise Agreement 2015-2017, allowing it to take effect as a legally binding contract between the employer and the employees. This decision enables the agreement to regulate the employment terms and conditions for the relevant workers, providing them with a clear understanding of their rights and obligations under the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.