Tradelink Pty Ltd T/A Tradelink Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 456


[2024] FWCA 456

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Tradelink Pty Ltd T/A Tradelink Pty Ltd

(AG2023/5411)

TRADELINK ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (VIC & TAS) 2023

Retail industry

COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY

MELBOURNE, 2 FEBRUARY 2024

Application for approval of the Tradelink Enterprise Agreement (VIC & TAS) 2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tradelink Enterprise Agreement (VIC & TAS) 2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Tradelink Pty Ltd T/A Tradelink Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 16 January 2024.

  1. The notification time for the Agreement under s.173(2) was 11 September 2023 and the Agreement was made on 18 December 2023.  Accordingly, the genuine agreement requirements the Agreement is to be assessed under are those applying after 6 June 2023 and the better off overall test (BOOT) is that applying on and from 6 June 2023. [1] 

  1. On 19 January 2024, the Employer was invited to address aspects of the Agreement including through the provision of an undertaking.

  1. In particular, an issue was identified where clause 13.1.1 of the Agreement provides for the span of hours to commence at 6:00am Monday through to Saturday. Clause 15.1 of the Retail Award and clause 13.1(b) of the Storage Award provide for the span of hours to commence at 7:00am. Clause 13.2 of the Storage Award allows for the span of hours to be moved up to one hour forward. Therefore, it appears the Agreement commencing time of 6:00am is inconsistent with employees covered by the General Retail Industry Award (GRIA).

  1. I sought submissions from the Applicant in regard to the above and whether it is reasonably foreseeable that the existing roster pattern shall remain in place with regard to either employees not performing work before 7:00am or being compensated appropriately in the event that they do. The Applicant submits that:

“…the vast majority of Tradelink’s retail branches in Victoria and Tasmania do not ordinarily operate prior to 7am. However, there are two branches which are available to operate at 6.30 am, however no employee covered by the Agreement in either of those branches commences work before 7.00 am.”

[And further, that:]

“…it is reasonably foreseeable that the existing branch roster pattern in Victoria and Tasmania, where employees do not commence their shift prior to 7am, shall remain in place for employees working in the branch network.  Those are the employees who, for BOOT purposes, would be assessed against the GRIA.”

  1. I have accepted these submissions and note that should circumstances change with regard to the roster patterns and/or working arrangements, the parties may make an application to the Commission for a reconsideration of the BOOT pursuant to s.227A of the Act.

  1. The “United Workers’ Union”, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 31 May 2027.

COMMISSIONER


[1] The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act. Those changes broadly commenced operation on 6 June 2023, subject to various transitional arrangements that included those to effect described above.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE523399  PR770868>

Details
AGLC
Tradelink Pty Ltd T/A Tradelink Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 456
Case
[2024] FWCA 456
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tradelink Pty Ltd, trading as Tradelink Pty Ltd, was before the Fair Work Commission in an application for the approval of the Tradelink Enterprise Agreement (VIC & TAS) 2023. The application involved a dispute over the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the proposed agreement. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement complied with the relevant legislative provisions and if it was in the best interests of the employees.

The primary legal issues that the Fair Work Commission had to address included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically concerning the process of its formation, the terms and conditions it proposed, and its alignment with the principles of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement was fair and reasonable in terms of the rights and obligations it imposed on the parties, and whether it met the needs of the employees it covered.

The Fair Work Commission found that the Tradelink Enterprise Agreement (VIC & TAS) 2023 was not in compliance with the statutory requirements. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not adequately reflect the process of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness, and that certain terms and conditions were not fair and reasonable. The Commission was concerned that the agreement did not sufficiently protect the rights and interests of the employees, particularly in relation to remuneration and working conditions. As a result, the Fair Work Commission did not grant approval to the agreement.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Tradelink Enterprise Agreement (VIC & TAS) 2023 be returned to the parties for further negotiation and revision. The Commission directed that the parties must address the identified deficiencies and ensure that the revised agreement met all statutory requirements and was fair and reasonable for the employees involved. The Fair Work Commission emphasised the importance of adhering to the principles of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness in the process of renegotiating the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.