Trade mark application number 2033032 (30) – SNACKLES - in the name of Noshu Foods Pty Ltd

Case

[2020] ATMO 158

30 September 2020


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Trade mark application number 2033032 (30) – SNACKLES - in the name of Noshu Foods Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 158 [2020] ATMO 158 30 September 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned a trade mark application, number 2033032, for the mark SNACKLES, filed by Noshu Foods Pty Ltd. The application was opposed by Snack Foods Limited. The proceeding was brought under section 33 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) before Nicholas Barbey.

The primary legal issue before the delegate was whether the trade mark SNACKLES was inherently adapted to distinguish the goods of Noshu Foods Pty Ltd from the goods of other persons, as required by section 41(3) of the Act. This involved considering whether the mark had an "ordinary signification" in relation to the goods for which it was sought to be registered, namely confectionery, snack bars, and related food items.

The delegate reasoned that the term "snackles" did not have an ordinary signification in the English language, nor was it a word that would be readily understood by consumers to describe the nature or quality of the goods. While the applicant acknowledged the mark was a play on the word "snacks," the delegate found that it was not so obvious or descriptive as to lack inherent adaptability to distinguish. The delegate applied the principles that a trade mark is inherently adapted to distinguish if it is not descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of the goods, and that a coined word or a word with no established meaning is generally considered to possess this quality.

The delegate concluded that the trade mark SNACKLES was inherently adapted to distinguish the goods of Noshu Foods Pty Ltd and therefore ordered that the opposition be dismissed and the trade mark application be accepted.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Statutory Construction

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0