Trad v Jones (No. 3) (EOD)
Case
•
[2013] NSWADTAP 13
•18 March 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Trad v Jones (No. 3) (EOD) [2013] NSWADTAP 13
[2013] NSWADTAP 13
18 March 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Trad v Jones (No. 3) (EOD), the parties were Mr Trad, the appellant, and Alan Jones and Harbour Radio Pty Limited, the respondents. The dispute arose from a defamation case where Mr Trad had sued the respondents for defamatory statements made during a radio broadcast. The case reached the New South Wales Court of Appeal, which was tasked with reviewing the lower court's decision regarding the costs incurred during the appeal.
The legal issues before the court were primarily concerned with the allocation of costs in the appeal process. Specifically, the court had to decide whether the costs incurred by Mr Trad in pursuing the appeal should be borne by the respondents and, if so, in what proportion. Additionally, the court needed to determine the appropriate process for assessing the quantum of the costs if the parties could not agree on the amount.
The court ruled that Alan Jones and Harbour Radio Pty Limited should bear one half of Mr Trad's costs of the appeal. This decision was based on the principle that the losing party in an appeal generally pays the costs of the appeal, and the court found that Mr Trad was the prevailing party in this instance. The court also provided that if the parties could not agree on the quantum of costs, the matter would be referred to the Supreme Court of New South Wales for assessment. This approach ensures that the costs are fairly determined without unduly burdening the prevailing party.
The legal issues before the court were primarily concerned with the allocation of costs in the appeal process. Specifically, the court had to decide whether the costs incurred by Mr Trad in pursuing the appeal should be borne by the respondents and, if so, in what proportion. Additionally, the court needed to determine the appropriate process for assessing the quantum of the costs if the parties could not agree on the amount.
The court ruled that Alan Jones and Harbour Radio Pty Limited should bear one half of Mr Trad's costs of the appeal. This decision was based on the principle that the losing party in an appeal generally pays the costs of the appeal, and the court found that Mr Trad was the prevailing party in this instance. The court also provided that if the parties could not agree on the quantum of costs, the matter would be referred to the Supreme Court of New South Wales for assessment. This approach ensures that the costs are fairly determined without unduly burdening the prevailing party.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Trad v Jones (No 8) [2015] NSWCATAD 64
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Trad v Jones (No 8)
[2015] NSWCATAD 64
Ekermawi v Jones (No 3)
[2014] NSWCATAD 58
Toga Pty Ltd v Perpetual Nominees Ltd (No 2) (RLD)
[2013] NSWADTAP 15
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
2
Chand v Railcorp of NSW (No 2)
[2011] NSWCA 80
Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Northern NSW Football Ltd (Rd)
[2010] NSWADTAP 28
Tu v University of Sydney (No 2)
[2002] NSWADTAP 25