Tracey and Meade-Mortensen
Case
•
[2008] FamCA 1162
•25 November 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tracey and Meade-Mortensen [2008] FamCA 1162
[2008] FamCA 1162
25 November 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Tracey and Meade-Mortensen*, heard before Jordan J, the dispute concerned the living arrangements and parental responsibility for a child born in September 2001. The court was required to determine the future living arrangements for the child, who would reside with the Mother, and to allocate sole parental responsibility to her. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the father should have any contact or communication with the child.
The court was also tasked with discharging previous orders made on 23 January 2006, specifically paragraphs 2, 3, and 4, and lifting a PACE Alert that was in place concerning the child. Furthermore, the court needed to address the particulars of the obligations created by its new orders, the consequences of contravention, and information regarding assistance for parties to comply with the orders, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.
Jordan J ordered that the child live with the Mother and that the Mother have sole parental responsibility. The father was prohibited from spending time with or communicating with the child. The court discharged specific prior orders and lifted the PACE Alert. The particulars of the obligations and consequences of these orders were to be set out in an attached Fact Sheet, forming part of the court's orders.
The court was also tasked with discharging previous orders made on 23 January 2006, specifically paragraphs 2, 3, and 4, and lifting a PACE Alert that was in place concerning the child. Furthermore, the court needed to address the particulars of the obligations created by its new orders, the consequences of contravention, and information regarding assistance for parties to comply with the orders, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.
Jordan J ordered that the child live with the Mother and that the Mother have sole parental responsibility. The father was prohibited from spending time with or communicating with the child. The court discharged specific prior orders and lifted the PACE Alert. The particulars of the obligations and consequences of these orders were to be set out in an attached Fact Sheet, forming part of the court's orders.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0