[2016] FWCA 2311
DECISION
Fair Work Act 2009 s.210—Enterprise agreement Toxfree Australia Ltd (AG2016/613) TOXFREE - QUEENSLAND ALUMINA LTD (QAL) INDUSTRIAL
SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2016
Manufacturing and associated industries
COMMISSIONER HUNT BRISBANE, 12 APRIL 2016 Application for variation of the Toxfree - Queensland Alumina Ltd (QAL) Industrial Services
Enterprise Agreement 2015 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement
known as Toxfree-Queensland Alumina Ltd (QAL) Industrial Services Enterprise Agreement
2015-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work
Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Toxfree Australia Ltd, the employer covered by the
Agreement.
[2] The employer statutory declaration in support of the application for approval of a
variation was declared by Mr Brian Hansen, Manager – Industrial Services – North East. A
statutory declaration in support of the application for approval of a variation was declared by
Mr Benjamin Swan, Branch Secretary of the Australian Workers’ Union (the AWU). The
AWU is an employee organisation covered by the Agreement and entitled to represent the
industrial interests of employees covered by the Agreement. The application for variation of
the Agreement is by consent.
[3] The application seeks to vary the Agreement to give effect to the following:
(a) A reduction in the hourly rate of pay paid to employees; (b) A reduction in the annual leave entitlement of continuous shift workers from 300 hours per annum to 210 hours per annum;
(c) A reduction in the personal leave entitlement of continuous shift workers from 120 hours per annum to 84 hours per annum;
(d) The cessation of the payment of personal leave accruals to employees on termination; and
(e) A new classification structure.
[2016] FWCA 2311
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this
application for approval of a variation have been met. Of particular note, I am satisfied that
the variations in paragraph [3] above continue to satisfy the terms of Part 2 -2, the National
Employment Standards of the Act, and the better off overall test pursuant to s.193(1) of the
Act. The requirements in Regulation 2.09A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 for the
signing of a variation to the enterprise agreement have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act,
will operate from the date of this decision.
[6] A consolidated version of the agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
COMMISSIONER
| Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer |
| <Price code A, AE416080 PR578999> |
- AGLC
- Toxfree Australia Ltd [2016] FWCA 2311
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2311
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the proposed variations met the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Fair Work Act, including compliance with the National Employment Standards and the better off overall test under s.193(1) of the Act. Additionally, the court needed to ensure that the variation met the signing requirements outlined in Regulation 2.09A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.
The Commissioner was satisfied that the proposed variations met all the necessary requirements. The Commissioner approved the variation to the enterprise agreement, which would take effect from the date of the decision. A consolidated version of the varied agreement was attached to the decision.
The Fair Work Commission approved the variation to the Toxfree-Queensland Alumina Ltd (QAL) Industrial Services Enterprise Agreement 2015-2016, as applied to employees of Toxfree Australia Ltd. The approved variation included a reduction in the hourly rate of pay, annual leave, and personal leave entitlements for continuous shift workers, as well as the cessation of the payment of personal leave accruals upon termination. The variation would operate from the date of the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.