TOUREL & REIDEL
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 116
•28 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
TOUREL & REIDEL [2018] FamCA 116
[2018] FamCA 116
28 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Family Court of Australia, presided over by Carew J, considered a dispute between a father and mother concerning their child. The primary contention revolved around parental responsibility and decision-making for the child, who had been living with the father since 2014. The mother sought involvement in long-term decisions, while the court also addressed issues of international travel, family violence, the child's surname, and a request for a psychiatric assessment of the father.
The court was required to determine whether the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility applied, given the history of family violence. It also had to consider the child's wishes regarding their surname and the appropriateness of international travel for the child. Furthermore, the court needed to address the mother's contact with her fiancé in relation to the child and whether a further psychiatric assessment of the father was warranted.
Carew J found that the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility was rebutted due to family violence, and consequently, the father was granted sole parental responsibility. The court ordered that the mother and child undergo counselling and that future time between the mother and child would be determined based on parental agreement and the child's wishes. The father was permitted to obtain an international travel document for the child. Crucially, the mother was restrained from permitting or facilitating the child's contact with her fiancé. In response to the child's expressed wish to change their surname due to bullying, the court ordered that the surname be changed. No order was made for a further psychiatric assessment of the father, as he had previously undergone such an assessment.
The court was required to determine whether the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility applied, given the history of family violence. It also had to consider the child's wishes regarding their surname and the appropriateness of international travel for the child. Furthermore, the court needed to address the mother's contact with her fiancé in relation to the child and whether a further psychiatric assessment of the father was warranted.
Carew J found that the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility was rebutted due to family violence, and consequently, the father was granted sole parental responsibility. The court ordered that the mother and child undergo counselling and that future time between the mother and child would be determined based on parental agreement and the child's wishes. The father was permitted to obtain an international travel document for the child. Crucially, the mother was restrained from permitting or facilitating the child's contact with her fiancé. In response to the child's expressed wish to change their surname due to bullying, the court ordered that the surname be changed. No order was made for a further psychiatric assessment of the father, as he had previously undergone such an assessment.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Natural Justice
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
TOUREL & REIDEL [2018] FamCA 116
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2