Tothill and Crowther (No 2)
Case
•
[2019] FamCA 276
•3 May 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tothill and Crowther (No 2) [2019] FamCA 276
[2019] FamCA 276
3 May 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Tothill and Crowther (No 2)*, the mother applied for the Honourable Justice Hannam to recuse himself from further hearing an interim parenting matter. The application was based on an apprehension of bias.
The central legal issue before the court was whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the judge, requiring his disqualification from the proceedings. This involved the application of the well-established two-step test for determining apprehended bias in judicial decision-making.
Justice Hannam applied the two-step test, which requires the court to first identify the facts and circumstances that might give rise to the apprehension of bias, and then determine whether a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered those facts and circumstances, would conclude that the judge was not impartial. After considering the evidence and submissions, the judge found that the mother had not established a sufficient basis to warrant recusal.
Consequently, the mother’s application that Justice Hannam recuse himself from further hearing the matter was dismissed.
The central legal issue before the court was whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the judge, requiring his disqualification from the proceedings. This involved the application of the well-established two-step test for determining apprehended bias in judicial decision-making.
Justice Hannam applied the two-step test, which requires the court to first identify the facts and circumstances that might give rise to the apprehension of bias, and then determine whether a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered those facts and circumstances, would conclude that the judge was not impartial. After considering the evidence and submissions, the judge found that the mother had not established a sufficient basis to warrant recusal.
Consequently, the mother’s application that Justice Hannam recuse himself from further hearing the matter was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
1
TOTHILL & CROWTHER
[2019] FamCA 191
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
[2000] HCA 63
Johnson v Johnson
[2000] HCA 48