Tomson and Tomson and Ors

In the matter of *Tomson and Tomson and Ors*, Kent J of the Family Court of Australia considered a dispute between the parties concerning property interests. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the division of rental income, is not detailed in the provided text, but it clearly involved financial entitlements arising from leased properties.

The central legal issues before the court revolved around the equitable distribution of income derived from two specific leased properties, identified as B Street, Suburb C and D Street, Suburb E. The court was required to determine the appropriate proportion of net rent and profits each party should receive from these assets pending further orders.

Kent J ordered that the Wife be entitled to one-half of the net rent and profits from the B Street property and one-third of the net rent and profits from the D Street property, with these entitlements to continue until further order. The costs of the Applicant and Second Respondent in relation to the proceeding were reserved for determination by the trial Judge.