[2013] FWCA 5532 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2001)
TOMAGO ALUMINIUM COMPANY PTY. LIMITED - MAINTENANCE/TRADES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Aluminium industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON | SYDNEY, 8 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Tomago Aluminium Company Pty. Limited - Maintenance/Trades Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tomago Aluminium Company Pty. Limited - Maintenance/Trades Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 15 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE402976 PR540003>
- AGLC
- Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5532
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5532
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved assessing whether the proposed agreement provided employees with a fair and reasonable outcome in comparison to the existing agreement, and whether it ensured no employee was worse off as a result of the new terms. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement adhered to the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The fairness and procedural correctness of the agreement were pivotal to the case.
The Commission concluded that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the "better off overall test" and the "no-disadvantage test." It found that the new agreement provided employees with a fair and reasonable outcome compared to the existing terms, and that no employee would be worse off. Additionally, the Commission determined that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act, including adequate consultation and the provision of relevant information to the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the Maintenance/Trades Enterprise Agreement 2013.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.