[2014] FWCA 3684 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Tomack Investments Pty Ltd T/A North Brisbane Truck Hire
(AG2014/846)
NORTH BRISBANE TRUCK HIRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 3 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the North Brisbane Truck Hire Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the North Brisbane Truck Hire Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Tomack Investments Pty Ltd T/A North Brisbane Truck Hire (the Company). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On 2 June 2014 undertakings were provided by Mr B Stranks, the Company’s Director. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Company’s undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached to this decision at Annexure A and forms part of the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE408452 PR551405>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Tomack Investments Pty Ltd T/A North Brisbane Truck Hire [2014] FWCA 3684
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3684
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was a "single interest" agreement, whether it was "in writing", whether it was "in good faith", and whether it contained the "bare minimum" terms and conditions. The Commission found that the agreement was a single interest agreement, was in writing, and was made in good faith. However, the Commission found that the agreement did not contain the bare minimum terms and conditions as required by section 230 of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the agreement did not include minimum wage rates and did not provide for the payment of penalty rates for Sunday work.
The Commission found that the parties had not reached agreement on these issues, and that the employer had not taken reasonable steps to reach agreement. The Commission refused to approve the agreement as it did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the parties were free to negotiate a new agreement that included the bare minimum terms and conditions. The Commission made no orders as the agreement was not approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.