Tokely and Tokely
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 638
•2 March 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tokely and Tokely [2017] FCCA 638
[2017] FCCA 638
2 March 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The proceedings involved the parties, Tokely and Tokely, concerning the welfare and living arrangements of their two children, X and Y. The matter came before Judge Brown of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
The court was required to determine the interim living arrangements for the children and to establish a process for gathering further information to assist in making final orders. Key legal issues included the children's best interests, as guided by sections 60CC, 61DA, and 65DAA of the *Family Law Act 1975*, and the weight to be given to the children's expressed wishes, considering their maturity and understanding.
Judge Brown ordered that the children reside with their mother in Brisbane. To inform future decisions, the court directed the parties and children to attend an assessment with a Regulation 7 practitioner for the preparation of a family report. This report was to address specific matters outlined in the *Family Law Act 1975*, including interviews with the parties and children, observed interactions, the children's views, and any other factors relevant to their welfare. The court also scheduled a conciliation conference and provided directions regarding the dissemination of the family report, including important caveats about its evidentiary status and the prohibition on public dissemination under section 121 of the *Family Law Act 1975*.
The court was required to determine the interim living arrangements for the children and to establish a process for gathering further information to assist in making final orders. Key legal issues included the children's best interests, as guided by sections 60CC, 61DA, and 65DAA of the *Family Law Act 1975*, and the weight to be given to the children's expressed wishes, considering their maturity and understanding.
Judge Brown ordered that the children reside with their mother in Brisbane. To inform future decisions, the court directed the parties and children to attend an assessment with a Regulation 7 practitioner for the preparation of a family report. This report was to address specific matters outlined in the *Family Law Act 1975*, including interviews with the parties and children, observed interactions, the children's views, and any other factors relevant to their welfare. The court also scheduled a conciliation conference and provided directions regarding the dissemination of the family report, including important caveats about its evidentiary status and the prohibition on public dissemination under section 121 of the *Family Law Act 1975*.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Tokely and Tokely [2017] FCCA 638
Most Recent Citation
Tokely and Tokely (No.2) [2018] FCCA 2712
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Morgan v Miles
[2007] FamCA 1230
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[1997] HCA 25
M & S
[2006] FamCA 1408