Ting and Fingal (No 3)

In the matter of *Ting and Fingal (No 3)*, Johns J of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered applications made by the parties in a dispute. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between Ting and Fingal is not detailed in the provided text, but the proceedings concerned the management of extant applications and the preparation for a further hearing.

The court was required to determine the procedural steps necessary to advance the litigation towards a final resolution. This included setting timelines for the filing and service of submissions, the identification and disclosure of documents upon which parties intended to rely, and the provision of cost estimates to the court.

Johns J ordered that all extant applications be adjourned for a further hearing on 3 September 2013. Prior to this hearing, each party was directed to file and serve a bullet-point summary of their arguments and a list of discoverable documents they intended to rely upon, with an opportunity for the opposing party to inspect these documents. Furthermore, each party was ordered to provide the court with a statement detailing their incurred costs to date, the source of those funds, and anticipated future costs until the conclusion of the hearing.